![]() ![]() The former refers to those features of nature, culture, and people that are used in the discourses and classifications of science, politics, cultural activism, regional marketing, tourism, governance, and political or religious regionalization, to distinguish one place from others. He thought it would be beneficial to distinguish analytically two aspects of place identity, namely, place identity of a place and people’s place identity. Another dominant explanation of place identity can be found in most of Paasi’s articles ( Paasi, 1986, 1991, 2002c, 2003, 2009a, b). Proshansky’s view on place identity has been widely referred to. As broadly acknowledged, place identity was initially introduced by Proshansky (1978), who defined place identity as “those dimensions of self that define the individual’s personal identity in relation to the physical environment by means of a complex pattern of conscious and unconscious ideas, feelings, values, goals, preferences, skills, and behavioral tendencies relevant to a specific environment” ( Proshansky, 1978, p. The social constructivist theory of place identity sheds light on individuals’ subjective perceptions of geographical space, providing valuable insights for studies of various disciplines, such as geography, sociology, psychology, environmental sciences and ecology, public administration, spatial planning, and so on ( Haartsen et al., 2000). Place identity is a versatile concept upon which many psychological theories of human–environment relations are built ( Zimmerbauer et al., 2012 Gieseking et al., 2014). Finally, this paper summarizes the meanings of place identity in four dimensions and in turn offers some suggestions for further research directions. To supplement the scientometric analysis, a deep survey on measuring methods and roles of place identity in the contents of academic articles was done to trace knowledge connections between different empirical understandings of place identity. These meanings are intertwined in shaping the knowledge base of thematic concentrations. Versatile meanings of place identity are witnessed in different clusters and articles of a cluster. ![]() A network of co-cited references identified seven dominant research clusters, of which the research on the influence of place identity on social actors’ attitudes and behaviors is most prominent and the research on the effects of physical environment change on place identity captures the latest emerging area. Studies in this field experienced an active exploration in plural disciplines after 2000, and the hot area gradually concentrated on the discipline of humanities and social sciences after 2010 and shifted toward place marketing until now. The scientometric review reveals the extensive applications of place identity in various topics. ![]() The data set input into CiteSpace consists of 1,011 bibliographic records retrieved from the core database of Web of Science with a title search of the articles published between 1985 and July 2019. CiteSpace, a scientometric tool for visualizing and analyzing trends and patterns in scientific literature, is used to identify the active topics and new developments of publications in place identity. In order to synthesize the extensively studied place identities and their meanings, this paper reviews how researchers have conceived and deconstructed place identity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |